|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Grey Azorria
Federation Industries
113
   |
Posted - 2012.03.12 20:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
How about nerfing both incursions (more LP, much les isk - especially in high sec) and bounties (harder nerf for high sec than low and null - possibly increase salvage to compensate)?
FIxes the risk reward scale and inflation.
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience. |
Grey Azorria
Federation Industries
113
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 21:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:CCP Soundwave wrote:gfldex wrote:[quote=CCP Soundwave]
Love makes pretty blind, you know. We all know how much you love your baby that is Incursions. Please don't cuddle it until it dies.
You're aware that we're making adjustments to Incursions right? I've never said we didn't need to look at Incursion income in isolation, the point I made was that in terms of money coming into the economy, bounties are a massive issue. I'm not entirely sure why some of you keep insisting that it's either or. Do Incursions need looking at? Absolutely, that's already been done and is awaiting deployment. Are Incursions the big issue in terms of isk coming into the economy? Not even remotely. Which I assume what you mean by adjustments are changes to VGs to remove blitzing while boosting assault and HQ income right? Side question when will we see a dev blog about those changes? After fanfest right? And will we have plenty of time to test them on Sisi to make sure there arent any surprises right? Yet thanks for yet again pointing how wrong many are about Incursion Inflation. They just don't get it. In my opinion all they see is rage from Incursions providing an alternative to broken nullsec.
Hmmmmm.... Actually I think he did more damage to your arguement - since most people were not against hitting bounties, but rather against hitting bounties instead of (rather than as well as) incursions. while you seem to be going on about how incursions are fine as they are.
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience. |
Grey Azorria
Federation Industries
113
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 21:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
Which I assume what you mean by adjustments are changes to VGs to remove blitzing while boosting assault and HQ income right?
Side question when will we see a dev blog about those changes? After fanfest right? And will we have plenty of time to test them on Sisi to make sure there arent any surprises right?
Yet thanks for yet again pointing how wrong many are about Incursion Inflation. They just don't get it. In my opinion all they see is rage from Incursions providing an alternative to broken nullsec.
Why the hell would we boost assault and HQ isk rewards when we need to reduce the flow of isk into the game?
I'm reasonably confident that it isn't as black and white as that, as it sounds like they are indirectly nerfing the income from vanguards (the real incursion money maker) - and after all CCP wouldn't risk boosting the incurbears risk free income - not when a very large chunk of the player base is already pissed off about it.
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience. |
Grey Azorria
Federation Industries
113
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 21:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:baltec1 wrote:[quote=Endeavour Starfleet]
Why the hell would we boost assault and HQ isk rewards when we need to reduce the flow of isk into the game? I wonder how many times they have to say Incursions arent the main thing causing the inflation before you just get the point? BTW you do realize that HQs and Assaults make a tiny portion of injected Incursion isk right? A 10M boost per site will do minimal increase in the long run.
And how many times to we have to say that they are still a pretty big RISK FREE contributor (bolded the bit that pisses the most people off).
And yes, we all hate bots too, but CCP has killed, and will continue to kill, lots and lots of the automated buggers.
(@DarthNefarius, I would also like to see tech nerfed - but left it out because it doesn't actually print isk, and as for a bias against high sec - Risk vs Reward, but thats all for another thread)
(@Endevour Starfleet - again, *Sigh* I should have listened to my own sig...)
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience. |
Grey Azorria
Federation Industries
113
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 22:09:00 -
[5] - Quote
Has anyone actually considered how much of an ISK sink Dust 514 might be?
Think about it, we pay one group of dust bunnies a bunch of ISK (which they then get blown up) to go and blow up another group of dust bunnies ISK.
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience. |
Grey Azorria
Federation Industries
113
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 22:09:00 -
[6] - Quote
Damm forums
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience. |
Grey Azorria
Federation Industries
114
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 22:21:00 -
[7] - Quote
Seleia O'Sinnor wrote:CCP Soundwave wrote:We're looking at the economy constantly and looking at our options.
One of the fundamental issues we have is that we're making everyone "better" at making money, so the effect kind of snowballs. Right now we're considering everything form increasing taxes to lowering bounties across the board. Or just remove incursions.
Nah, even I think thats to mean. They are, as has been repeatedly pointed out, just one small part of an incredibly complex puzzle.
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience. |
|
|
| |
|